<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Top 5 Myths About Income Tax</title> <atom:link href="http://blog.taxresource.ca/top-5-myths-about-income-tax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://blog.taxresource.ca/top-5-myths-about-income-tax/</link> <description>Canadian Tax Help &#38; Financial Planning Resources</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:53:18 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Tax Guy</title><link>http://blog.taxresource.ca/top-5-myths-about-income-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-2883</link> <dc:creator>Tax Guy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:24:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.taxresource.ca/?p=2005#comment-2883</guid> <description>The interest is deductible provided it is traceable. The issue is one of to whom it is deductible.My feeling is that it would be deductible in proportion to the proportion of interest paid on the HELOC. But that is the issue under question from the CRA.Whatever is done should be well documented to show your intentions and have a contingency plan in place should anything get denied by the CRA.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The interest is deductible provided it is traceable. The issue is one of to whom it is deductible.</p><p>My feeling is that it would be deductible in proportion to the proportion of interest paid on the HELOC. But that is the issue under question from the CRA.</p><p>Whatever is done should be well documented to show your intentions and have a contingency plan in place should anything get denied by the CRA.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Canadian Finance</title><link>http://blog.taxresource.ca/top-5-myths-about-income-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-2881</link> <dc:creator>Canadian Finance</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:21:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.taxresource.ca/?p=2005#comment-2881</guid> <description>Thanks Tax Guy, I look forward to seeing the reply!Since the house, mortgage and HELOC are in both of our names, I&#039;m assuming I should (or need to?) have the investments in both our names as well.The interest will be tracable, the HELOC is only for investing. So it would be allowable, though they could possibly alter my split in an audit.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Tax Guy, I look forward to seeing the reply!</p><p>Since the house, mortgage and HELOC are in both of our names, I&#8217;m assuming I should (or need to?) have the investments in both our names as well.</p><p>The interest will be tracable, the HELOC is only for investing. So it would be allowable, though they could possibly alter my split in an audit.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tax Guy</title><link>http://blog.taxresource.ca/top-5-myths-about-income-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-2869</link> <dc:creator>Tax Guy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:57:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.taxresource.ca/?p=2005#comment-2869</guid> <description>@ Tom:There is no simple answer. Each person in a marriage is responsible for accounting for every dollar brought and earned in a marriage. This seems to indicate that there may not be a 50/50 &quot;beneficial&quot; ownership of a home for tax purposes and subsequently the underlying investments.In addition, for interest to be deductible it must be traceable to investment income.There is an issue of the attribution rules and interest deductibility rules applying.I wrote a letter to the CRA some time ago asking this very question and they are researching this issue. Once I receive the letter, I will post it verbatim!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Tom:</p><p>There is no simple answer. Each person in a marriage is responsible for accounting for every dollar brought and earned in a marriage. This seems to indicate that there may not be a 50/50 &#8220;beneficial&#8221; ownership of a home for tax purposes and subsequently the underlying investments.</p><p>In addition, for interest to be deductible it must be traceable to investment income.</p><p>There is an issue of the attribution rules and interest deductibility rules applying.</p><p>I wrote a letter to the CRA some time ago asking this very question and they are researching this issue. Once I receive the letter, I will post it verbatim!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Canadian Finance</title><link>http://blog.taxresource.ca/top-5-myths-about-income-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-2868</link> <dc:creator>Canadian Finance</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:19:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.taxresource.ca/?p=2005#comment-2868</guid> <description>Good post Tax Guy. I have a question about Myth 1, if a joint investment account is funded with a joint HELOC, would that be a 50/50 split? This is what I was planning to do for a Smith Manouvre soon.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post Tax Guy. I have a question about Myth 1, if a joint investment account is funded with a joint HELOC, would that be a 50/50 split? This is what I was planning to do for a Smith Manouvre soon.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Canadian Personal Finance Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Unemployment Numbers up a Little</title><link>http://blog.taxresource.ca/top-5-myths-about-income-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-2865</link> <dc:creator>Canadian Personal Finance Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Unemployment Numbers up a Little</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:11:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.taxresource.ca/?p=2005#comment-2865</guid> <description>[...] Canadian Tax Resource wrote about the Top 5 Income Tax Myths , well worth a [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Canadian Tax Resource wrote about the Top 5 Income Tax Myths , well worth a [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Weekly Review-Welcome Globe and Mail Readers Edition &#124; Financial Highway</title><link>http://blog.taxresource.ca/top-5-myths-about-income-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-2863</link> <dc:creator>Weekly Review-Welcome Globe and Mail Readers Edition &#124; Financial Highway</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:03:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.taxresource.ca/?p=2005#comment-2863</guid> <description>[...] Canadian Tax Resource sheds some light on Top 5 mythes about income tax. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Canadian Tax Resource sheds some light on Top 5 mythes about income tax. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 4/15 queries in 0.012 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 300/308 objects using disk: basic

Served from: blog.taxresource.ca @ 2012-02-12 03:22:34 -->
